Metrics
Date |
05/11/2007
|
Author |
See references below |
Affiliation
|
|
Email |
|
Metrics
|
D-metric, Δ-metric, ∇-metric, Contribution and Coverage metrics |
Referencess
|
[1] D. Joshua, D. Knowles, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler, "A tutorial on the performance assessment of stochastic multiobjective optimizers", TIK-Report No. 214, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, February 2006. [3] Y. Colette, P. Siarry, "Three new metrics to measure the convergence of meta-heuristics towards the Pareto frontier and the aesthetic of of a set of solutions in biobjective optimization", available online at www.sciencedirect.com [6] E. Zitzler, "Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications", Master’s thesis, Swiss federal Institute of technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland, Nov. 1999
|
Description
of the metrics
|
In principle, to assess the performance of two multi-objective optimizers, two basic approaches exist in the literature; the attainment function approach, and the indicator approach. To assess just one of criteria such as i) convergence to the Pareto-optimal front, ii) having an uniform distribution of the Pareto front and iii) having a better coverage of the objective space, many quality indicators (metrics) have been proposed.
|