Metrics
  
| 
   Date  | 
  
   05/11/2007
        | 
 
| 
   Author  | 
  
   See references below  | 
 
| 
   Affiliation
    | 
  
   
  | 
 
| 
   Email  | 
  |
| 
   Metrics
        | 
  
   D-metric, Δ-metric, ∇-metric, Contribution and Coverage metrics  | 
 
| 
   Referencess
      | 
  [1] D. Joshua, D. Knowles, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler, "A tutorial on the performance assessment of stochastic multiobjective optimizers", TIK-Report No. 214, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, February 2006. [3] Y. Colette, P. Siarry, "Three new metrics to measure the convergence of meta-heuristics towards the Pareto frontier and the aesthetic of of a set of solutions in biobjective optimization", available online at www.sciencedirect.com [6] E. Zitzler, "Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications", Master’s thesis, Swiss federal Institute of technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland, Nov. 1999 
  | 
 
| 
   Description
  of the metrics
        | 
  
   In principle, to assess the performance of two multi-objective optimizers, two basic approaches exist in the literature; the attainment function approach, and the indicator approach. To assess just one of criteria such as i) convergence to the Pareto-optimal front, ii) having an uniform distribution of the Pareto front and iii) having a better coverage of the objective space, many quality indicators (metrics) have been proposed. 
 
  |